Saturday, January 21, 2012

Third smallest baby ever leaves US hospital


1
LOS ANGELES: A baby believed to be the third smallest birth-weight infant ever to survive left hospital in Los Angeles, doctors and the proud parents said.
Melinda Star Guido was born last August, 16 weeks early, weighing only 9.5 ounces (270 grammes) — less than a can of soda or the same as two iPhones — and has spent nearly five months in a neonatal intensive care unit.
“I am so excited to finally have my baby come home,” said her mother Haydee Ibarra, 22. “We have waited almost five months for this moment. It is so wonderful and we are ready to bring Melinda home.”
She is the third smallest baby to survive, according to Global Birth Registry figures cited by LA County health officials.
1a
Dr Rangasamy Ramanathan, neonatology chief at the LA County-USC Medical Center, said he wasn’t initially sure if Melinda was going to survive beyond a few days.
“This doesn’t happen every day. In my 30 years here, … this is the first time it ever happened that we were able to discharge a baby who weighed less than 400 grams, or 300 grams,” he said.
“We have reached a milestone by being able to see Melinda go home,” he added “We are hopeful to see many more milestones accomplished in Melinda’s development as we follow her care over the next six years.”

Friday, January 20, 2012

Abortion rate decline stalls, unsafe abortions rise


1
LONDON (Reuters) - A long-term decline in the rates of abortion worldwide has stalled and the proportion of terminations that are unsafe and put women's lives at risk is rising, an international group of scientists said on Thursday.
Researchers from the World Health (WHO) and the Guttmacher Institute, which researches sexual and reproductive health, said a trend of falling numbers of abortions between 1995 and 2003 had leveled out since then, suggesting that increased access to contraception worldwide has also stalled.
"We are also seeing a growing proportion of abortions occurring in developing countries where the procedure is often clandestine and unsafe," said Gilda Sedgh, lead author of the study and a senior researcher at the Guttmacher Institute.
Between 1995 and 2003, the abortion rate per 1,000 women of childbearing age (15 to 44 years) worldwide dropped from 35 to 29. This new study found that in 2008 the global abortion rate was 28 per 1,000, virtually unchanged from 2003's level.
"This plateau coincides with a slowdown in contraceptive uptake," Sedgh told a briefing in London about the findings. "And without greater investment in quality family planning services, we can expect this trend to persist."
Alarmingly, Sedgh said, the proportion of abortions characterized as unsafe rose from 44 percent in 1995 to 49 percent in 2008.
The researchers, whose study was published in the medical journal, define unsafe abortion as a procedure for terminating a pregnancy carried out by someone who does not have the necessary skills, or in an environment that does not meet minimal medical standards, or both.
CONTRACEPTION
Despite the decline in the abortion rate, there were 2.2 million more abortions in 2008, when 43.8 million were carried out, than in 2003 when there were 41.6 million. This is due to the increasing global population, the researchers said.
From 2003 to 2008, the number of abortions fell by 0.6 million in the developed world, but increased by 2.8 million in developing countries.
Of all the world's regions, Latin America has the highest rate, with 32 per 1,000 women in 2008. Africa and Asia follow close behind with rates of 29 and 28 per 1,000 women respectively. Rates for North America and Oceania were the lowest, at 19 and 17.
Sedgh said that while in Europe around 30 percent of pregnancies end in abortion, there was a far higher rate in Eastern Europe than in the rest of the region.
In Western Europe there were 12 abortions per 1,000 women in 2008, while in Eastern Europe at the same time there were 43.
Sedgh said the study's findings showed strong correlations between abortion rates and access to effective contraceptives, and between abortion rates and the law.
"The abortion rates is clearly lower in places were abortion laws are more liberal," she said, pointing to Africa and Latin America where rates are high.
There is also a strong link between restrictive laws and higher rates of unsafe abortions. Between 95 percent and 97 percent of all abortions in Africa and Latin America are unsafe, the study found.
Sedgh said family planning services around the world appeared to be failing to keep up with rising demand for effective contraception driven by the desire for small families and better control over the timing of births.
"There are still 215 million women in developing countries who have an unmet need for contraceptives," she said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/zH63pI The Lancet, online

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Long term, gastric bypass beats out banding: study


1
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Among weight-loss surgery options, gastric bypass comes with more complications shortly after surgery than gastric banding, but makes up for it with fewer long-term side effects and repeat operations, new research suggests.
People who got bypass surgery also lost weight faster, and more kept it off, in the study of more than 400 obese Swiss patients.
"What we would like with any of the (weight-loss) procedures ideally would be to have the least long-term complications, certainly the least long-term complications requiring (repeat) surgery," said Dr. Michel Suter, a surgeon from the Hopital du Chablais, Aigle, who worked on the study.
"There are drawbacks with bypass, there are side effects, and we have to take them into account," he told Reuters Health. But "overall, if I had to choose between the procedures, I certainly recommend the bypass."
Still, one researcher not involved in the study said that when complications do happen with gastric bypass, they are often more serious than complications after banding.
Suter and his colleagues looked back at records of 442 obese patients who underwent weight-loss surgery at their hospitals between 1998 and 2005.
To qualify for surgery, all patients had to have a body mass index -- a measure of weight in relation to height -- of at least 40, or at least 35 if they also had an obesity-related illness. That's the equivalent of a five-foot, six-inch person weighing at least 248 pounds or 217 pounds, respectively.
Half of the patients had gastric band procedures, which involve placing a band around the top of the stomach to limit its size to a small pouch. The other half were treated with gastric bypass, when part of the stomach is stapled off and then rerouted to bypass a segment of the small intestine. The two groups were similar in terms of their age and initial weight.
Doctors checked in with those patients at least twice a year for the next six years post-surgery.
Complications in the month after the procedure -- which typically include infections -- were more common after gastric bypass than after banding: 17 percent of bypass patients had any surgery-related problems, compared to five percent in the banding group.
"The operation itself is a little more complicated and a little more risky," Suter explained.
But after that point, the bypass group lost weight faster, put less of it back on and suffered fewer long-term complications, including those that called for a repeat procedure.
Six years post-surgery, 12 percent of bypass patients had a body mass index above 35, considered severely obese, compared to one-third after gastric banding.
And thirteen percent of patients needed re-operation after complications with gastric bypass, versus close to 27 percent following banding.
The long-term complications of gastric banding were generally related to the band eroding and needing to be removed, food intolerance or stretching of the esophagus, the researchers reported Monday in the Archives of Surgery.
With gastric bypass, patients most often had internal hernias, a type of bowel blockage that can be life-threatening if not treated.
Complications
'NOT ALL COMPLICATIONS ARE ALIKE'
Dr. Christine Ren-Fielding, a weight-loss surgeon at the New York University School of Medicine, said that her research has suggested gastric bypass complications tend to be much more serious than complications related to banding.
"We all know that not all complications are alike," Ren-Fielding, who was not involved in the new study, told Reuters Health by email. "For example a wound infection treated with antibiotics is not the same as a...leak which requires re-operation and extended hospitalization."
While Ren-Fielding said banding has been found to be "a relatively safe procedure," technique and surgeon experience can affect outcomes of any surgery.
Weight-loss surgery typically costs around $20,000. Gastric banding may be cheaper than bypass initially because of a simpler procedure and shorter hospital stay -- but Suter said that the need for band adjustments over time may drive up costs.
When it comes to choosing a procedure, Ren-Fielding said, "My philosophy is one of helping the patient be successful and optimizing outcomes, regardless of which operation they have, because all bariatric surgeries have their overwhelming benefits in treating the disease of obesity."
"I'm not at a point when I would say, 'No way' to a patient who asks for a band and has no contraindications to the band," Suter said.
Still, he added, "I discourage them to have a band because I don't want to operate on them two or three times -- one time is enough. Bypass is more definitive."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/yw13CX Archives of Surgery, online